<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FCGID timeout causing Rails 500 errors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brian.pontarelli.com/2006/08/06/fcgid-timeout-causing-rails-500-errors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brian.pontarelli.com/2006/08/06/fcgid-timeout-causing-rails-500-errors/</link>
	<description>Brian Pontarelli</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pet rockette</title>
		<link>http://brian.pontarelli.com/2006/08/06/fcgid-timeout-causing-rails-500-errors/#comment-3115</link>
		<dc:creator>pet rockette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brian.pontarelli.com/2006/08/06/fcgid-timeout-causing-rails-500-errors/#comment-3115</guid>
		<description>He's not using mod_fastcgi--he's using mod_fcgid, a completely different beast, which happens to be much more stable and more scalable (than both fastcgi and mongrel, in my experience.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s not using mod_fastcgi&#8211;he&#8217;s using mod_fcgid, a completely different beast, which happens to be much more stable and more scalable (than both fastcgi and mongrel, in my experience.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Pontarelli</title>
		<link>http://brian.pontarelli.com/2006/08/06/fcgid-timeout-causing-rails-500-errors/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Pontarelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brian.pontarelli.com/2006/08/06/fcgid-timeout-causing-rails-500-errors/#comment-772</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite="Tim O'Brien"&gt;
psstâ€¦use mongrel - fastcgi is painful enogh to configure, and (for me at least) it was dog slow compared to running a mongrel cluster.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Took a look and since I'm going to be adding SSL, Mongrel looks just as hard to configure as FastCGI. I still have to use Apache, plus starting up a number of Mongrel instances, and mod balancer. Am I missing something? Or is the goal speed? Is Mongrel like uber fast?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="Tim O'Brien"><p>
psstâ€¦use mongrel - fastcgi is painful enogh to configure, and (for me at least) it was dog slow compared to running a mongrel cluster.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Took a look and since I&#8217;m going to be adding SSL, Mongrel looks just as hard to configure as FastCGI. I still have to use Apache, plus starting up a number of Mongrel instances, and mod balancer. Am I missing something? Or is the goal speed? Is Mongrel like uber fast?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://brian.pontarelli.com/2006/08/06/fcgid-timeout-causing-rails-500-errors/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brian.pontarelli.com/2006/08/06/fcgid-timeout-causing-rails-500-errors/#comment-771</guid>
		<description>psst...use mongrel - fastcgi is painful enogh to configure, and (for me at least) it was dog slow compared to running a mongrel cluster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>psst&#8230;use mongrel - fastcgi is painful enogh to configure, and (for me at least) it was dog slow compared to running a mongrel cluster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
