<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruby logging and performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brian.pontarelli.com/2006/07/03/ruby-logging-and-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brian.pontarelli.com/2006/07/03/ruby-logging-and-performance/</link>
	<description>Brian Pontarelli</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Pontarelli</title>
		<link>http://brian.pontarelli.com/2006/07/03/ruby-logging-and-performance/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Pontarelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 15:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brian.pontarelli.com/2006/07/03/ruby-logging-and-performance/#comment-317</guid>
		<description>Excellent point! They look very similar. This could help distinquish:

logger.debug do "foo" end

(Can you do blocks like that?) But that kinda looks like ass. I think the if statements perhaps are the cleanest way to handle it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point! They look very similar. This could help distinquish:</p>
<p>logger.debug do &#8220;foo&#8221; end</p>
<p>(Can you do blocks like that?) But that kinda looks like ass. I think the if statements perhaps are the cleanest way to handle it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thomas</title>
		<link>http://brian.pontarelli.com/2006/07/03/ruby-logging-and-performance/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>David Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 23:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brian.pontarelli.com/2006/07/03/ruby-logging-and-performance/#comment-312</guid>
		<description>Great example of improving performance while logging in Ruby.  Though, from a maintenance perspective, I'd bet money that "the next guy" who comes along and starts logging will use parens.  Why? Simply because he didn't know the trick and braces look like parens when quickly scanning example code.

Otherwise, awesome post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great example of improving performance while logging in Ruby.  Though, from a maintenance perspective, I&#8217;d bet money that &#8220;the next guy&#8221; who comes along and starts logging will use parens.  Why? Simply because he didn&#8217;t know the trick and braces look like parens when quickly scanning example code.</p>
<p>Otherwise, awesome post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
